It does seem strange that it is being handled this way.
Problem with manufacture = manufacturer is liable and should bear all costs associated with remedy.
I am not sure why no is being taken for an answer by the distributor/retailer here.
I also see a lot of "blah blah but he is a member and sponsor and friend". This is not a good way to do business because it limits remedy avenues and adds unnecessary emotion and pressure to members and organisers.
As much as I would have liked a jacket, part of me is content that I did not order one, unfortunately.
well basically, we don't have much choice, if we want jackets in good time, we do it this way, Zen is basically caught in the middle, his Overseas jacket supplier has told him that yes they made a mistake, but they are not replacing the jackets, just offered him $10 off the replacement jackets, Mark has offered refunds to anyone who would like it, all you have to do is contact him.
or do we send back 81 jackets to him, and we 1. find another supplier to make the jacket, 2. wait another 4 months before we will see anything.
there was a no win situation, after much discussion this is what we came up with to do.
Zen is bearing all the costs of the postage and sending the jacket around, also in replacing the jackets for people who don't get one in the swap over.
If you read ST2UP's post Mark is upfront in wearing the costs.
we offered to co-ordinate the jacket swapping around to help out. hence I took time off work, chris and jean have cancelled a trip away, we want to fix this as quickly and simply as we can