Author Topic: The Tin Foil Hat thread (Read 107873 times)

Gadget · « **Reply #225 on:** June 12, 2016, 08:54:01 PM »

Quote from: Diesel on June 11, 2016, 08:08:06 PM

There are not many people left who think that an actual aircraft crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11. Nor in the field in Pennsylvania for that matter.

This angle in this footage all but confirms everyone's suspicions.

http://www.disclose.tv/news/pentagon_attack_on_911_was_a_cruise_type_missile__anonymous/131978?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=fb_organic

I really have a problem with this.

Thousands of people died that day, reading out the names of all the dead, takes hours.

This conjecture and speculation really denigrates the significance of those deaths.

How do you think the families feel about having the deaths of their loved ones trivialised this way?

sent using Tapatalk

Diesel · « **Reply #226 on:** June 12, 2016, 09:13:18 PM »

They have the option of believing 19 terrorists pulled of this incredible feat that was planned in a cave in Afghanistan or that their own government or agency thereof plotted a far more sinister operation against its own citizens like as was ALREADY PROPOSED by the Joint Chiefs of Staff in "Operation Northwoods".

Nether is a pleasant result - but one of the two scenarios DID happen!

Have a read of this...

OERATION NORTHWOODS <---- click there

And here is some curious information about where the Pentagon was hit.....

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/location.html

Very convenient don't you think?

Do you think a plane even went in to the Pentagon?

Gadget · « **Reply #227 on:** June 12, 2016, 09:33:28 PM »

An educated man in a cave is as dangerous as a dumb man in a house.

sent using Tapatalk

Diesel · « **Reply #228 on:** June 13, 2016, 08:58:49 AM »

Is Obama's Birth Certificate Forged/False?

The except from a text that is verifiable with sources listed:

Smile: It's only Monday!

Maybe this is not a smiling matter!!..

Something funny about the following, only it isn't funny!

Here are 4 Simple questions from an attorney..... are there ANY logical
answers? You judge..

Here's what I would like to know. If the TRUTH ever comes out and it is decided that Obama was never eligible to be president, what happens to all the laws he signed into being and all the executive orders?
Should they all be null and void?
Here are 4 Simple questions from a reputable attorney..... this should really get your "gray matter" to churning, even if you are an Obama fan.
For all you "anti-Fox News" folks, none of this information came from Fox.
All of it can be verified from legitimate sources (Wikipedia, the Kapiolani
hospital website itself, and a good history book, as noted herein). It is very easy for someone to check out.

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes'. So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't used at that time ?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 and Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, Right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa".
This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet Exist?
Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". (check it below)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya_%28http:/en.wikipedia..org/wiki/Kenya%29

3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively.
The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
(CHECK IT BELOW)
(http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx)

Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?

4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936 - if my math holds

(Honest! I did that without a calculator!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old. Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes?

Very truly yours,

RICHARD R. SILVERLIEB
Attorney at Law
354 Eisenhower Parkway
Livingston, NJ 07039

Marcus · « **Reply #229 on:** July 12, 2016, 07:38:57 AM »


! No longer available

Sabie · « **Reply #230 on:** July 12, 2016, 08:07:17 AM »

I tend to agree with Gadget on this one. A lot of people did die that day and we shouldn't discount that. The same goes for the moon landings and the extraordinary heroism of those men and later women who have gone into space, particularly the earlier flights.

There are also people out there who say the holicost during WWII didn't happen.

It's all about downplaying the event and as Gadget said trivialising the event. This all goes to the softening us to such events for most likely many purposes.

I suppose these people believe Port Arthur didn't really happen, it was just a set up by Howard to remove guns from the Australian people......... You sad cases...

Quote from: Gadget on June 12, 2016, 08:54:01 PM

Quote from: Diesel on June 11, 2016, 08:08:06 PM
There are not many people left who think that an actual aircraft crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11. Nor in the field in Pennsylvania for that matter.

This angle in this footage all but confirms everyone's suspicions.

http://www.disclose.tv/news/pentagon_attack_on_911_was_a_cruise_type_missile__anonymous/131978?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=fb_organic

I really have a problem with this.

Thousands of people died that day, reading out the names of all the dead, takes hours.

This conjecture and speculation really denigrates the significance of those deaths.

How do you think the families feel about having the deaths of their loved ones trivialised this way?

sent using Tapatalk

Gadget · « **Reply #231 on:** July 12, 2016, 08:13:29 AM »

Thanks Sabie.

I'll just leave this here.
http://roundearthsense.blogspot.com.au/p/home-page.html

sent using Tapatalk

Diesel · « **Reply #232 on:** July 13, 2016, 12:32:01 PM »

Quote

Quote from: Sabie on 12-07-2016, 08:07:17

I suppose these people believe Port Arthur didn't really happen, it was just a set up by Howard to remove guns from the Australian people......... You sad cases...

And keep in mind... no one is a "sad case" for thinking something different.

Brock · « **Reply #233 on:** July 13, 2016, 06:03:39 PM »

Quote

And keep in mind... no one is a "sad case" for thinking something different./quote]

Except Diesel, and Peter and Murp....

Kev Murphy · « **Reply #234 on:** July 13, 2016, 06:07:00 PM »

OI!

Sabie · « **Reply #235 on:** July 13, 2016, 07:49:11 PM »

And keep in mind... no one is a "sad case" for thinking something different.

Oh yes they are not for just thinking but for enacting, living and pushing their thinking onto others .... Yes they are a "Sad Case" when they do that ..... Well I for one feel sorry for them and their delusion .....

Diesel · « **Reply #236 on:** July 13, 2016, 08:43:33 PM »

Quote from: Brock on July 13, 2016, 06:03:39 PM

Quote<blockquote>And keep in mind... no one is a "sad case" for thinking something different./quote]

Except Diesel, and Peter and Murp.... </blockquote>

Hey Kev - let's get Brock to give the old "big stick" treatment to this cheeky mug! You with me?

Brock · « **Reply #237 on:** July 13, 2016, 09:54:12 PM »

Kev Murphy · « **Reply #238 on:** July 13, 2016, 10:10:12 PM »

Diesel · « **Reply #239 on:** July 14, 2016, 10:13:17 AM »

Uh Oh!!!!!

http://www.disclose.tv/news/dont_play_pokmon_go_it_is_the_latest_government_surveillance_psyop/133115?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=fb_organic

Cerebral Knievel · « **Reply #240 on:** July 14, 2016, 10:40:18 AM »

I will not be surprised to find a small wooden hut deep in the backwoods of Taswegia with Diesels shingle on it

I seem to exit ever increasingly concerned with each subsequent visit to this dark little corner of the forum.
Gotta go call my broker now....i think the price of ali foil is about to go up

Gadget · « **Reply #241 on:** July 14, 2016, 11:21:52 AM »

Diesel · « **Reply #242 on:** July 16, 2016, 10:50:35 PM »

More from the (and I contextually quote) "sad cases" at NASA....

Diesel · « **Reply #243 on:** July 16, 2016, 11:26:34 PM »

Does anyone actually believe they are looking at the Moon passing in front of the Earth from a telescope positioned 1 MILLION MILES AWAY in this link????

http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth

Now watch it again with this in mind....

Kev Murphy · « **Reply #244 on:** July 16, 2016, 11:53:31 PM »

Funny?... MY 4 megapixel camera has nowhere near the definition of NASA pics?

Looks like ??? Yup!.. its a FULL moon...

Wassa matter?.. what did you EXPECT the backside of the moon to look like?

Sabie · « **Reply #245 on:** July 17, 2016, 12:47:49 AM »

More from the (and I contextually quote) "sad cases" at NASA....

You cut me Dave, you cut me deep ....... Such a cheap shot..... Ooo....Aaahhh my aching heart...

Gadget · « **Reply #246 on:** July 17, 2016, 07:34:34 AM »

Quote from: Diesel on July 16, 2016, 11:26:34 PM

Does anyone actually believe they are looking at the Moon passing in front of the Earth from a telescope positioned 1 MILLION MILES AWAY in this link????

http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth

Now watch it again with this in mind....

Does this mean flat earth theory has been dismissed?

:stirpot

sent using Tapatalk

Gadget · « **Reply #247 on:** July 17, 2016, 07:35:59 AM »

Quote from: Diesel on July 16, 2016, 10:50:35 PM

More from the (and I contextually quote) "sad cases" at NASA....

Next you'll be telling me one wave on the ocean doesn't look life any other wave.

sent using Tapatalk

Kev Murphy · « **Reply #248 on:** July 17, 2016, 05:44:09 PM »

Quote from: Gadget on July 17, 2016, 07:35:59 AM

Next you'll be telling me one wave on the ocean doesn't look life any other wave.

sent using Tapatalk

(except when it's a tsunami... or will they claim they are fake too?)

Diesel · « **Reply #249 on:** July 17, 2016, 11:35:18 PM »

Quote from: Sabie on July 17, 2016, 12:47:49 AM

More from the (and I contextually quote) "sad cases" at NASA....

You cut me Dave, you cut me deep ....... Such a cheap shot..... Ooo....Aaahhh my aching heart...

Oh silly... hearts aren't allowed in this ridiculous thread - only the funny bone.

Oh... and that suspicious eyebrow raise when news topics have a curious ambiguity.

But there's still no denying those clouds are copied - c'mon.

News:

Author Topic: The Tin Foil Hat thread (Read 107873 times)