OzSTOC
OzSTOC Ride Reports, Pictures & Videos => Pictures & Video's and Games => Topic started by: Marcus on April 24, 2015, 09:20:50 AM
-
(http://i.imgur.com/g8P8vae.gif)
-
Pretty definitive (I hope the outriggers are the non ABS example)
-
I'd rather have ABS. It'd be a real bastard trying to lane filter with the outriggers on the non-ABS version.
-
Surely the straight line stop is ABS.
The lock-up would cause all the slewing.
I did the emergency stop exercise on a training day. We had to stop in a box about 4 metres long from 80 kph.
The ST did it comfortably. The rest smoked their rears and over-shot. All were lighter than the ST13.
-
And the ST can get back to 80 in another 4 metres
Without smoking the tyre again... o:) o:) o:)
-
Surely the straight line stop is ABS.
Yes the first one is ABS Thread title according to appearence
-
A little bias in my opinion. The rider deliberately throws the bike around when the outriggers are fitted.
A.
-
A little bias in my opinion. The rider deliberately throws the bike around when the outriggers are fitted.
A.
I thought that too. A big rigged!!
-
I think the stopping distance with the outriggers is acceptible :-++ Why wouldn't you grab a ridiculous handful of brakes, lock the wheels up to tip the bike over and have a bit of fun just because you can? It would be interesting to see what the rider would have done without the outriggers. It's a p*ss poor comparison but having said that the ABS is always a fantastic backup for a skill misfire (unless you are on gravel heading downhill towards a bend, then you might be better off without it. ;-*