What you missed is that for us is that on any given corner or bend in the road is that a turn to the right is longer in distance than a turn to the left. Your centre tread pattern might have done 5000km but the left side would have travelled less while the right side would have travelled more.
I'm not sure about that either. In my view, you would have to ride many, many, many more RH corners than LH corners before there would any significant extra distance covered, and tyre wear evident due to that theory.
Less distance travelled - YES, but insignificant, eg. using a very rudimentary example of travelling in a very large circle, or in this case route.
If your circumnavigated Australia by road (via Highway 1) clockwise, you would travel approximately 14,500km -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_1_(Australia) (overall right corners and curves). Based on the principles of the C = 2 pi r formula (where C = circumference, 2 = 2, pi = pie - but I couldn't find a symbol, and r = radius ) and if you travelled anti-clockwise you would travel approximately 14,981km (overall left corners and curves), ie. 19km less.
This would not be the case if you travelled more right corners than left, eg. did a clockwise loop through the Snowy Mountains nine weekends out of ten, and only an anti-clockwise loop on the 10th weekend, and only if you really carved up the corners with peg scraping (or near peg scraping).
In urban areas, tyre wear would be different (in my situation) as I don't corner nearly as hard, and get on to the shoulder of the tyre.