Mornin' John, Kappy et al...
Hear what you say but have to ask the question. What if you had done nought about replacing shims?
Why l ask this is simple. Having had the luxuary of owning one 1100 from new l have kept a written record of all the clearance checks since new. Yes, the values decreased as time went on but since about 120k they have not changed at all. Last checked at 160k.
OK that was bike 1, onto bike 2. As you know this bike had been ridden very hard and had worked very hard befofe Laure got it for me. Initially, l didn't bother with even looking at the tappets. However, after changing the timing belt at 152k and finding it was sooo stretched it should have been replaced at 100k and the subsequent top end rattle due to cam gear / shaft / allen key excess wear noise, courtesy of the new belt, it got me thinking.
So when l had the bike in Melboure a couple of years back l decided maybe best to run the feelers over it. And to my surprise, yes ALL clearances were on tight side, but still within tolerance. Haven't bothered to check since as the bike is back north enjoying some sunshine (as is the owner).
So l rationalise that as this bike like all x police ST's had a thrashing and after 165K's when l finally checked the tappets and found them low, but with tolerance, l will presume the 'pattern' l have seen in bike one will repeat with bike two. That is, 'settle' at the lower clearane end.
Sorry if some spelling etc above is dodgey, but l am writing this diatribe using my 60 yo thumb on an iphone while having a lie-in and an earl grey before getting this retired ar$3 out of bed & into the Qld sunshine ;-)
Ciao, the can :-)